Liberals' real fears about Conservatives

          Currently, the liberal left controls the presidency, the Congress and a majority of the state's governorships. Also, with the exception Foxnews, they also control the media. Obviously, Hollywood is pretty much controlled by the liberal left. Everyday, President Barrack Obama blames former President Bush and the republicans for the economic problems faced in our cour country. Currently, he has an unprecedented majority of fellow democrats in both the House of Representatives and the Senate. Yet, he still feels compelled to complain about the supposed "obstructionist" republicans who block his legislation which often goes against the wishes of the majority of the American people. Besides this, he has a favorable media excluding Foxnews who often make excuses for his obvious shortcomings and even embellish his successes to make him look better. Again, Obama and his administration still feel the need to complain about the dreaded Foxnews because they do not play this game. Finally, Hollywood is controlled entirely by the liberal left. As a result, conservatives are often portrayed as tyrants or evil bigoted people. The small town people(who often are from red districts) are portrayed as racist, ignorant pricks who are ignorant country bumkins. I watched the movie '2012' the other night for the first time. Like the other movie about disaster concerning globlal warming 'The Day after Tomorrow', this film had an ignorant, bullying conservative played by Oliver Platt. Fortunately, both of these men in the two movies respectively were straightened out somewhat and learned to be more open-minded for the "betterment of man". Obviously, the first year and a half of President Obama's presidency has not gone well. Yes, he has passed major legislation, but it was passed because of the large majorities he his political parties had in the House of Representatives and the Senate. Unfortunately, most of the bills passed went against public sentiment. The overhaul of Health Care was very unpopular and his pushing this legislation through bordered on abuse of power.
          Conservatism in its pure form is successful everytime its tried. It is successful because its focus is on following the rules and respecting other people, but sometimes there is need to criticize. The second part of my definition is where the problem is for promoting criticism. Here is a biblical verse from 2 Timothy 4- "1 In the presence of God and of Christ Jesus, who will judge the living and the dead, and in view of his appearing and his kingdom, I give you this charge: 2 Preach the word; be prepared in season and out of season; correct, rebuke and encourage—with great patience and careful instruction. 3 For the time will come when people will not put up with sound doctrine. Instead, to suit their own desires, they will gather around them a great number of teachers to say what their itching ears want to hear. 4 They will turn their ears away from the truth and turn aside to myths. 5 But you, keep your head in all situations, endure hardship, do the work of an evangelist, discharge all the duties of your ministry." Obviously, this quote being from the Bible will automatically be rejected by the liberal elitist and mainstream media despite its wisdom. If this verse came from the quaran or the buddha book, the liberal elitists and the mainstream media might take this verse more seriously-still unlikely, however. Sometimes conservatives need to take a stand against the everyday thinking that is popular. For example, I understand the plight of the African American and atrocity of slavery. Also, I understand the original thinking about giving African American people help in the form of affirmative action and welfare privileges. However, this help has become an entitlement and needs to be phased out. Unfortunately, the African American neighborhoods are worse off than when these assistance programs based purely on race began. Gains have been made socially, but will never be at an acceptable level either way as long as we have a liberal race baiting media and a leftist Hollywood. The truth is that conservatism will lead the way to a better life everyone especially African Americans. Subsequently, feelings need to be hurt to do this. I call it 'tough love', liberals call it racism. Economically, tax cuts work everytime they are tried. The supposed "horrible" Bush tax cuts will expire at the end of this year, but many democrats are NOW AFRAID to let these tax cuts expire?http://www.time.com/time/politics/article/0,8599,2005389,00.html  If these tax cuts are so bad, why are they so scared to let them expire? The truth is blaming Bush for for the bad economy because of the tax cuts was very effective for the deomocrats in the 2008 surge to victory. However, the reality was the tax cuts helped the economy and play no part whatsoever in the economic downfall. Its this type of TRUTH that really has the democrats panicked. The key to democrat victory is and has always been to distort reality and paint your opponent as evil or off the wall-the truth be damned. The major fears the democrats have is that when the overwhelming of the public realizes that conservatism is clearly better than liberalism by large margins, the democrat party will become extinct at least in the form it is now.
                   

Why is this OK?

                         Yesterday Lawrence Taylor was indicted on a rape charge for paying a 16 year old girl $300 to have sex with him. http://abcnews.go.com/Sports/wireStory?id=10991126 Now, I never have been much of a fan of Lawrence Taylor especially his personal life. Certainly, he is one of the all-time great linebackers, but his off the field antics are despicable at times. However, this latest alleged crime seems petty compared to the celebrated mainstream media story that came out today. http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=170553. Apparently, having a 10 year old boy as grand marshal of the gay pride parade in Fayetteville, Arkansas is an honorable thing, but Lawrence Taylor is vilified and going to prison for allegedly soliciting a 16 year old. Apparently, there was never any sex that occurred between the two people. Yet, the district attorney in the case feels Taylor was "endangering the welfare of the child." Although I am not justifying Taylor's actions, this girl was 16 and a prostitute. Certainly, she is of age to get an abortion. On the other hand, the organization GLADD is pimping a 10 year old boy as grand marshal of their gay pride parade. I thought NAMBLA no longer was a part of the gay pride parades? Not only, are there not charges brought against GLADD, the boy's parents, and the organizers of this event , but the event celebrating a 10 year old boy promoting gay sex is being celebrated the leftist mainstream media. How is using a 10 year old child as grand marshal promoting homosexual sex OK? If its not OK and a crime for Lawrence Taylor to solicit a 16 year old, then why on earth is it OK for the Fayetteville gay pride parade to have a 10 year old boy promote homosexual sex? Finally, if this boy is so proud about homosexuality, shouldn't the authorities look into the boy's parents and the organizers of the event also? Obviously, there is a strong chance this boy might have been violated by any one of these people. If not, why is he expert spokesman and grand marshal of the parade?

BP worse than Al Quaeda

               Apparently, I have concluded after watching today's spectacle in Congress over the oil link that British Petroleum is a worse enemy combatant than Al Quaeda or Iran or North Korea. A mistake was made two months ago. We still do not have a cause for this mistake, but it was SPECULATED that there might have been carelessness involved by the company. I have yet to hear anyone in Congress, the media or the White House accuse BP of intentionally causing the leak. Why? They have not done so because this accident was not intentional. It was an accident. I doubt that anyone that has lived in their adulthood has not made a mistake or had an accident of some type. Isn't this why we have insurance? Perhaps this accident is so damaging because of the location of the oil leak and the difficulty in fixing this? Ok-I hear my liberal friends saying "no duh". Yes, this is "no duh", but what group forced BP to drill so far offshore when BP could have drill on land? Can my liberal friends answer this? I think a mirror might help. These were the liberal groups like Green Peace and the Sierra Club who FORCED the drilling to be so far off shore.
               Sadly, the current Congress believes that "grilling" the top guy at British Petroleum will make things better. this reminds me of George Orwell's book "1984" where the people were so supposed to be agitated and stirred up with the "daily hate". The witch hunt today in Congress was an example of this. One Congressman, Joe Barton from Texas was scolded harshly for trying to apologize for this hazing.
http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/06/17/congressman-apologizes-bp-white-house-shakedown-million/
He had the nerve to call it a shakedown! Since when has Congress ever shook anyone down before? Acutally, when has anyone in Congress ever gone against these witch hunts? Anyway, Joe Barton did retract his remark gutlessly when he was scolded by fellow weasel moderate Republicans who are on the "hate BP" band wagon. Shouldn't we all be on Help and Work Together with BP to fix the leak and clean the leak up band wagon instead?
              Finally, the sorry spectacle by Congress today shows that we have misguided leadership in Congress and the White House who do NOT have the priorities or the interests of the American people in mind. If we are going to have a "daily hate", it should be aimed at people who want intentionally destroy us like Al Quaeda or Iran or Hugo Chavez in Venezuela. Apparently, our law makers would rather scold clueless executives of companies instead of tyranical leaders of countries or extreme Muslim organizations who are intent on destroying us. Ironically, the Obama administration has been harshest on The United States' two best allies Great Britain and Israel. Guess what? Russia, China, Iran, Venezuela, North Korea, the Muslim terrorists still hate us. Except now-they sense the weakness also.

The Arizona law-unfair-why?

                                  Recently, President Obama dissed the new Arizona law as unfair. My question is why? The media, the progressive democrats and even some misguided moderates like Michael Medved have painted the "illegal immigrants" as unfortunate victims of US business owners exploitation of them for cheaper wages. Although there might be some truth in part of this, where is the blame for the people who crossed the border illegally? Aren't these defenders of the these people enablers? The fact that the majority of these people are from Mexico is irrelevant.  There is a significant number of people from other countries that sneak across the Mexican border as well. This fact is often omitted by the defenders of illegal aliens or to be politically correct-"undocumented workers".
                                 I consider illegal aliens "line cutters who also get in free as well". They are line cutters because they cheat and get in before immigrants or US immigrant wannabes from other more distant countries who sometimes wait for many years before they can get their visas to come to the United States. Often, these people have to pay a high price with forever increasing immigration fees. Yet, the people who cross the border illegally here are not only tolerated, but given an almost "hero type" treatment or at least a "poor victim" status by many people in the media and many of our politicians and government leaders. Why? My theory is to gain political advantage amongst Hispanic or Mexican voters. Lets face it-President Obama and the democrats will need all the help they can in the upcoming election. Finally, I am sure Hollywood will keep showing those heavily slanted one sided movies and documentaries about the evil anti-undocumented bigot who is trying to break-up the happy family of all Mexican-Americans who come here. Unfortunately, we will not see the other side of the issue involving the "LEGAL IMMIGRANTS OR WANNABES" who pay a heavy price to come here. President Obama-where is the fairness for these people?

Obama and the UN's Hutzpa

http://www.newsmax.com/Headline/barack-obama-netanyahu-israel/2010/05/31/id/360603

           The above link is about the Obama response to Israel's soldier defending itself against an ambush by Palestinian attackers posing as humanitarians carrying aid. Obama is calling for the facts of the encounter immediately by Netanahu. Isn't this the man who was hiding the facts in the Joe Sestak job offer? Isn't this the man who distorted the facts about the Arizona immigration law? Several key Obama staff leaders like Attorney General Eric Holder and Homeland Security Janet Napolitano made accusations against the bill without even reading the the law itself. Of course, Obama's handling of the oil leak makes the captain of the Titanic look a genius! Yet, he feels compelled to Demand the Facts from Israel about the encounter they had earlier today with the flotilla. I guess the word hutzpa immediately comes to mind.
          On a brighter note, Obama's current scandals and failings will make him and the the democrat Congress weaker. Apparently, Obama has not gotten the memo with his demanding Israel to come out with the facts. Actually, Israel has come out with video and a pretty thorough explanation in near record time. If you compare this fast response as compared to Obama's slow response or explanation with the oil spill or Sestak for that matter, Israel's quick explanation certainly shines much brighter. Also, it took two months to determine that a missile sunk the South Korean ship. Despite the overwhelming evidence, North Korea still denies the attack. Where is the UN condemnation of this act of aggression? Can we say HUTZPA!